PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-461.37%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with CSIQ at -258.82%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-7.29%
Negative yoy D&A while CSIQ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.35%
SBC growth of 23.35% while CSIQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
-148.07%
Negative yoy working capital usage while CSIQ is 54.97%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-66.79%
AR is negative yoy while CSIQ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-96.02%
Negative yoy inventory while CSIQ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-1444.09%
Negative yoy AP while CSIQ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
141.56%
Growth well above CSIQ's 54.97%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
585.43%
Some yoy increase while CSIQ is negative at -70.37%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-697.99%
Negative yoy CFO while CSIQ is 46.20%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
53.60%
Some CapEx rise while CSIQ is negative at -21.73%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
We have some outflow growth while CSIQ is negative at -588.67%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
53.60%
We have mild expansions while CSIQ is negative at -25.55%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.