PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-89.04%
Negative net income growth while ENPH stands at 24.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
117.91%
Some D&A expansion while ENPH is negative at -14.27%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.97%
Slight usage while ENPH is negative at -35.74%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
134.34%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. ENPH's 393.24%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
-783.73%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with ENPH at -238.19%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-138.65%
Both negative yoy AP, with ENPH at -31.38%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
54.55%
Growth well above ENPH's 23.70%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
2048.96%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. ENPH's 4372.11%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
88.11%
Some CFO growth while ENPH is negative at -45.00%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-28.65%
Negative yoy CapEx while ENPH is 43.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Some yoy expansion while ENPH is negative at -42.29%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
43.44%
We have some liquidation growth while ENPH is negative at -27.60%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
74.56%
Growth well above ENPH's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-195.76%
Both yoy lines negative, with ENPH at -145.27%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while ENPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.