PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
345.34%
Net income growth above 1.5x ENPH's 24.63%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
10.04%
Some D&A expansion while ENPH is negative at -14.27%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
44.97%
Some yoy growth while ENPH is negative at -95.29%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
28.64%
SBC growth while ENPH is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
56.22%
Slight usage while ENPH is negative at -35.74%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-259.83%
AR is negative yoy while ENPH is 393.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
191.59%
Some inventory rise while ENPH is negative at -238.19%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
100.00%
A yoy AP increase while ENPH is negative at -31.38%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-2268.79%
Negative yoy usage while ENPH is 23.70%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-273.90%
Negative yoy while ENPH is 4372.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
105.32%
Some CFO growth while ENPH is negative at -45.00%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
0.84%
Lower CapEx growth vs. ENPH's 43.46%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-91.74%
Both yoy lines are negative, with ENPH at -27.60%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-260.93%
We reduce yoy other investing while ENPH is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-93.26%
Both yoy lines negative, with ENPH at -145.27%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
266.93%
Debt repayment above 1.5x ENPH's 100.00%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
67.66%
Similar buyback growth to ENPH's 70.00%. Walter Schloss sees parallel capital return priorities or a stable free cash flow for both.