PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-92.54%
Negative net income growth while ENPH stands at 24.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
11.35%
Some D&A expansion while ENPH is negative at -14.27%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
17.83%
Some yoy growth while ENPH is negative at -95.29%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-2.17%
Both cut yoy SBC, with ENPH at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
58.39%
Slight usage while ENPH is negative at -35.74%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
61.56%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. ENPH's 393.24%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
13.28%
Some inventory rise while ENPH is negative at -238.19%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-467.28%
Negative yoy usage while ENPH is 23.70%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
72.44%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. ENPH's 4372.11%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
17.58%
Some CFO growth while ENPH is negative at -45.00%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
61.76%
CapEx growth well above ENPH's 43.46%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-60.20%
Both yoy lines negative, with ENPH at -42.29%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-2.67%
Both yoy lines are negative, with ENPH at -27.60%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
111.02%
Growth well above ENPH's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
99.76%
We have mild expansions while ENPH is negative at -145.27%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
822.27%
Debt repayment above 1.5x ENPH's 100.00%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
100.00%
Issuance growth of 100.00% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-5.63%
We cut yoy buybacks while ENPH is 70.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.