PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
708.13%
Some net income increase while ENPH is negative at -15.06%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-2.72%
Negative yoy D&A while ENPH is 8.82%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-143.44%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
4.10%
SBC growth while ENPH is negative at -11.08%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
150.95%
Slight usage while ENPH is negative at -60.72%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-181.74%
AR is negative yoy while ENPH is 36.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-153.50%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with ENPH at -81.27%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
80.99%
Lower AP growth vs. ENPH's 248.11%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
137.65%
Growth well above ENPH's 61.83%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
112.79%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. ENPH's 347.00%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
946.34%
Some CFO growth while ENPH is negative at -50.67%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-235.47%
Both yoy lines negative, with ENPH at -20.96%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2383.17%
Negative yoy purchasing while ENPH stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-149.58%
We reduce yoy other investing while ENPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-229.08%
Both yoy lines negative, with ENPH at -20.96%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
400.53%
Debt repayment above 1.5x ENPH's 8.96%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-104.63%
We cut yoy buybacks while ENPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.