PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
77.59%
Net income growth above 1.5x ENPH's 22.84%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-35.92%
Negative yoy D&A while ENPH is 25.25%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
82.19%
Some yoy growth while ENPH is negative at -21.78%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
14.41%
SBC growth well above ENPH's 16.81%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
4740.72%
Well above ENPH's 2824.89% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
194.15%
AR growth well above ENPH's 86.18%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
234.29%
Inventory growth well above ENPH's 76.20%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-100.00%
Both negative yoy AP, with ENPH at -29.75%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
114.13%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. ENPH's 2672.96%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-94.79%
Negative yoy while ENPH is 41.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
521.21%
Operating cash flow growth 1.25-1.5x ENPH's 425.30%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better working capital management or consistent margin advantages.
-164.44%
Both yoy lines negative, with ENPH at -70.29%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-200.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while ENPH stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
99.44%
Purchases growth of 99.44% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
3767200.00%
Liquidation growth of 3767200.00% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
16357.52%
Growth of 16357.52% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
558.45%
We have mild expansions while ENPH is negative at -70.29%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-318.13%
We cut debt repayment yoy while ENPH is 43.37%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.47%
We cut yoy buybacks while ENPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.