PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
106.88%
Net income growth above 1.5x ENPH's 38.54%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
3.48%
D&A growth well above ENPH's 2.95%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-100.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while ENPH stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
23.36%
SBC growth well above ENPH's 2.79%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-167.34%
Negative yoy working capital usage while ENPH is 790.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-378.08%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with ENPH at -354.81%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
676.45%
Inventory growth well above ENPH's 278.55%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-163.33%
Negative yoy AP while ENPH is 618.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-40.25%
Negative yoy usage while ENPH is 52.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
10.11%
Some yoy increase while ENPH is negative at -0.93%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-139.66%
Negative yoy CFO while ENPH is 85.80%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
41.88%
Some CapEx rise while ENPH is negative at -6.12%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-660.94%
We reduce yoy other investing while ENPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-268.94%
Both yoy lines negative, with ENPH at -6.12%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
93.86%
Debt repayment above 1.5x ENPH's 4.12%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
49.31%
Buyback growth of 49.31% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.