PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
19.22%
Net income growth under 50% of ENPH's 90.46%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
10.08%
Some D&A expansion while ENPH is negative at -0.39%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
85.55%
Some yoy growth while ENPH is negative at -4.19%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
3.65%
Less SBC growth vs. ENPH's 10.71%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-59.85%
Both reduce yoy usage, with ENPH at -47.03%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-0.82%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with ENPH at -2768.71%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
79.04%
Inventory growth well above ENPH's 105.26%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-227.44%
Negative yoy AP while ENPH is 58.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-1409.91%
Negative yoy usage while ENPH is 80.12%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-1356.89%
Both negative yoy, with ENPH at -773.43%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-86.96%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with ENPH at -2.39%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-74.34%
Negative yoy CapEx while ENPH is 26.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.51%
Growth of 50.51% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
491.42%
Investing outflow well above ENPH's 26.64%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
63.18%
Debt repayment growth of 63.18% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
95.81%
Buyback growth of 95.81% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.