PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
28.04%
Net income growth at 50-75% of ENPH's 43.32%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging competitiveness unless expansions are planned.
9.75%
Some D&A expansion while ENPH is negative at -3.33%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-72.59%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
9.21%
SBC growth well above ENPH's 6.54%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
93.74%
Slight usage while ENPH is negative at -95.01%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
118.99%
AR growth while ENPH is negative at -57.11%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
131.68%
Some inventory rise while ENPH is negative at -134.52%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
100.00%
Lower AP growth vs. ENPH's 412.03%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
7.94%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. ENPH's 200.79%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-75.38%
Negative yoy while ENPH is 132.20%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
83.55%
Some CFO growth while ENPH is negative at -1284.41%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-52.37%
Both yoy lines negative, with ENPH at -91.84%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-197.33%
Negative yoy acquisition while ENPH stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-88.46%
We reduce yoy other investing while ENPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-61.84%
Both yoy lines negative, with ENPH at -91.84%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-66.92%
We cut debt repayment yoy while ENPH is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.38%
We cut yoy buybacks while ENPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.