PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-850.58%
Negative net income growth while ENPH stands at 57.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
19.42%
D&A growth well above ENPH's 2.80%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-3045.17%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-1.12%
Both cut yoy SBC, with ENPH at -16.04%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
1583.68%
Slight usage while ENPH is negative at -763.87%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-781.38%
AR is negative yoy while ENPH is 131.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
205.09%
Inventory growth well above ENPH's 84.74%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.87%
Negative yoy usage while ENPH is 990.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
16231.66%
Well above ENPH's 388.32%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
279.96%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x ENPH's 13.12%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-84.96%
Both yoy lines negative, with ENPH at -444.68%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
175.37%
Acquisition growth of 175.37% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1234.15%
Growth of 1234.15% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
-68.08%
Both yoy lines negative, with ENPH at -444.68%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
461.78%
Debt repayment growth of 461.78% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-109.14%
We cut yoy buybacks while ENPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.