PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-227.81%
Negative net income growth while ENPH stands at 27.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-3.18%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with ENPH at -3.65%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
615.99%
Some yoy growth while ENPH is negative at -74.50%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-5.80%
Negative yoy SBC while ENPH is 173.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
43.71%
Slight usage while ENPH is negative at -83.25%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-228.96%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with ENPH at -135.38%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-21.81%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with ENPH at -85.64%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
132.85%
AP growth well above ENPH's 168.17%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-26.80%
Both reduce yoy usage, with ENPH at -400.55%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
793.74%
Well above ENPH's 10.99%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
47.66%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x ENPH's 21.39%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
8.55%
Lower CapEx growth vs. ENPH's 58.58%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
1728.56%
Acquisition growth of 1728.56% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
280.77%
Growth of 280.77% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
3204.14%
Investing outflow well above ENPH's 58.58%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-836.47%
Both yoy lines negative, with ENPH at -205.84%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
91.74%
Buyback growth of 91.74% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.