PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
76.46%
Net income growth above 1.5x ENPH's 7.17%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-35.85%
Negative yoy D&A while ENPH is 13.13%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-11.27%
Negative yoy deferred tax while ENPH stands at 913.73%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-3.82%
Both cut yoy SBC, with ENPH at -5.55%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
17.99%
Less working capital growth vs. ENPH's 148.04%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
16.15%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. ENPH's 247.89%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
32.92%
Some inventory rise while ENPH is negative at -138.84%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-78.12%
Negative yoy AP while ENPH is 3.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
36.80%
Some yoy usage while ENPH is negative at -109.74%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-99.53%
Negative yoy while ENPH is 25.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-32.48%
Negative yoy CFO while ENPH is 67.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
6.25%
Some CapEx rise while ENPH is negative at -110.42%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while ENPH stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.24%
Growth of 29.24% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
-104.70%
Both yoy lines negative, with ENPH at -2193.75%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
151.93%
We repay more while ENPH is negative at -7.51%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.68%
Buyback growth of 6.68% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.