PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-240.92%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with ENPH at -1.46%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
16.39%
Less D&A growth vs. ENPH's 41.80%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-240.35%
Negative yoy deferred tax while ENPH stands at 229.13%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-11.41%
Negative yoy SBC while ENPH is 28.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-417.35%
Both reduce yoy usage, with ENPH at -167.32%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-125.90%
AR is negative yoy while ENPH is 58.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-300.90%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with ENPH at -292.24%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
354.74%
A yoy AP increase while ENPH is negative at -103.98%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-187.38%
Negative yoy usage while ENPH is 159.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
100.38%
Some yoy increase while ENPH is negative at -46.37%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-4410.58%
Negative yoy CFO while ENPH is 5.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-66.78%
Negative yoy CapEx while ENPH is 6.31%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Acquisition spending well above ENPH's 83.99%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12994.15%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x ENPH's 188.81%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
-6545.05%
We reduce yoy other investing while ENPH is 388.81%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
200.90%
Investing outflow well above ENPH's 107.14%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-161.73%
We cut debt repayment yoy while ENPH is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-193.28%
We cut yoy buybacks while ENPH is 96.89%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.