PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-119.63%
Negative net income growth while ENPH stands at 48.54%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
165.44%
Some D&A expansion while ENPH is negative at -2.00%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
118.57%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. ENPH's 293.43%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
30.31%
SBC growth well above ENPH's 11.02%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
58.77%
Less working capital growth vs. ENPH's 312.48%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
5.03%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. ENPH's 313.71%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
151.37%
Some inventory rise while ENPH is negative at -53.52%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-87.76%
Negative yoy AP while ENPH is 766.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
39.26%
Some yoy usage while ENPH is negative at -63.03%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
6295.31%
Some yoy increase while ENPH is negative at -30.81%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
48.66%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of ENPH's 95.87%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
-39.32%
Negative yoy CapEx while ENPH is 29.77%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while ENPH is 51.56%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
100.00%
We have some outflow growth while ENPH is negative at -26.71%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-9.77%
We reduce yoy invests while ENPH stands at 11.97%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
69.23%
Repurchase growth above 1.5x ENPH's 41.53%. David Dodd would see a strong per-share advantage if the share price is reasonably valued.