PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
328.19%
Net income growth above 1.5x ENPH's 49.15%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-35.01%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with ENPH at -21.55%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-155.21%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-7.28%
Both cut yoy SBC, with ENPH at -1.45%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
35.73%
Slight usage while ENPH is negative at -87.05%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-141.33%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with ENPH at -189.29%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-131.78%
Negative yoy inventory while ENPH is 52.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
517.38%
AP growth well above ENPH's 166.43%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
59.00%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. ENPH's 233.04%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-959.64%
Negative yoy while ENPH is 58.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
90.53%
Some CFO growth while ENPH is negative at -6.30%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-8.65%
Both yoy lines negative, with ENPH at -2.96%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
104.42%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. ENPH's 10870.97%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
114.62%
We have mild expansions while ENPH is negative at -859.71%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.26%
Repurchase growth above 1.5x ENPH's 16.00%. David Dodd would see a strong per-share advantage if the share price is reasonably valued.