PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-94.66%
Negative net income growth while ENPH stands at 33.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
18.09%
D&A growth well above ENPH's 33.84%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
3.05%
Some yoy growth while ENPH is negative at -10620.87%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-17.23%
Negative yoy SBC while ENPH is 21.70%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-115.10%
Negative yoy working capital usage while ENPH is 570.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
109.33%
AR growth while ENPH is negative at -92.26%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-1446.12%
Negative yoy inventory while ENPH is 80.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
292.60%
AP growth well above ENPH's 184.24%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-358.11%
Negative yoy usage while ENPH is 1.91%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
107.84%
Some yoy increase while ENPH is negative at -182.18%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-119.63%
Negative yoy CFO while ENPH is 34.95%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
61.42%
Some CapEx rise while ENPH is negative at -83.61%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-89.58%
Both yoy lines negative, with ENPH at -110.48%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2709.17%
We reduce yoy other investing while ENPH is 79.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-106.13%
We reduce yoy invests while ENPH stands at 65.05%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
107.83%
Debt repayment growth of 107.83% while ENPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.89%
Both yoy lines negative, with ENPH at -76.51%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.