PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-54.21%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with ENPH at -27.51%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-98.03%
Negative yoy D&A while ENPH is 9.09%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-79.51%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-35.29%
Both cut yoy SBC, with ENPH at -19.11%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
843.36%
Slight usage while ENPH is negative at -144.50%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
216.47%
AR growth while ENPH is negative at -775.81%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
281.62%
Inventory growth well above ENPH's 48.53%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-2710.57%
Both negative yoy AP, with ENPH at -93.12%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-100.22%
Both reduce yoy usage, with ENPH at -67.16%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
1908.77%
Well above ENPH's 173.26%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-5.06%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with ENPH at -45.83%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
7.77%
Lower CapEx growth vs. ENPH's 45.80%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
89.85%
Some acquisitions while ENPH is negative at -174.81%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines are negative, with ENPH at -11.24%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
91.97%
Growth well above ENPH's 145.08%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
71.97%
Investing outflow well above ENPH's 76.88%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-100.07%
We cut debt repayment yoy while ENPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
43.91%
Similar buyback growth to ENPH's 45.00%. Walter Schloss sees parallel capital return priorities or a stable free cash flow for both.