PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
60.74%
Net income growth similar to FSLR's 63.16%. Walter Schloss would find parallel expansions or market conditions in both firms’ profitability.
486.93%
Some D&A expansion while FSLR is negative at -0.98%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-128.09%
Negative yoy working capital usage while FSLR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.50%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. FSLR's 40.33%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.37%
Negative yoy usage while FSLR is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-138.82%
Negative yoy while FSLR is 65.83%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-100.51%
Negative yoy CFO while FSLR is 124.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
5.26%
Some CapEx rise while FSLR is negative at -39.89%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
842.50%
We have some outflow growth while FSLR is negative at -49.48%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
9.37%
We have mild expansions while FSLR is negative at -197.02%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while FSLR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
433.72%
Issuance growth of 433.72% while FSLR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.