PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-89.04%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with FSLR at -37.45%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
117.91%
D&A growth well above FSLR's 38.53%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.97%
Less working capital growth vs. FSLR's 1140.67%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
134.34%
AR growth of 134.34% while FSLR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-783.73%
Negative yoy inventory while FSLR is 125.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-138.65%
Negative yoy AP while FSLR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
54.55%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. FSLR's 466.40%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
2048.96%
Well above FSLR's 51.10%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
88.11%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of FSLR's 192.11%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-28.65%
Negative yoy CapEx while FSLR is 26.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while FSLR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
43.44%
Liquidation growth of 43.44% while FSLR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
74.56%
Growth well above FSLR's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-195.76%
We reduce yoy invests while FSLR stands at 27.72%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSLR at -99.81%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.