PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
144.23%
Net income growth above 1.5x FSLR's 49.45%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
3.55%
Less D&A growth vs. FSLR's 41.27%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.25%
Less SBC growth vs. FSLR's 100.00%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
65.78%
Slight usage while FSLR is negative at -4213.58%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
100.00%
AR growth of 100.00% while FSLR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
69.80%
Some inventory rise while FSLR is negative at -181.52%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-100.00%
Negative yoy AP while FSLR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
66.63%
Growth well above FSLR's 50.00%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-300.00%
Both negative yoy, with FSLR at -35.83%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
143.24%
Some CFO growth while FSLR is negative at -6.40%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
12.80%
Some CapEx rise while FSLR is negative at -114.86%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
100.00%
Some acquisitions while FSLR is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
69.96%
Some yoy expansion while FSLR is negative at -61.44%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-55.04%
Both yoy lines are negative, with FSLR at -66.62%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
171.29%
Growth well above FSLR's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
117.47%
We have mild expansions while FSLR is negative at -314.70%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
74.21%
Buyback growth of 74.21% while FSLR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.