PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
345.34%
Net income growth above 1.5x FSLR's 9.71%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
10.04%
D&A growth well above FSLR's 15.12%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
44.97%
Some yoy growth while FSLR is negative at -445.57%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
28.64%
Less SBC growth vs. FSLR's 76.12%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
56.22%
Slight usage while FSLR is negative at -40.40%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-259.83%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with FSLR at -98.75%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
191.59%
Some inventory rise while FSLR is negative at -182.52%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
100.00%
AP growth well above FSLR's 186.20%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-2268.79%
Negative yoy usage while FSLR is 17.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-273.90%
Both negative yoy, with FSLR at -255.99%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
105.32%
Some CFO growth while FSLR is negative at -64.64%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
0.84%
Lower CapEx growth vs. FSLR's 31.07%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-91.74%
Both yoy lines are negative, with FSLR at -4.87%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-260.93%
We reduce yoy other investing while FSLR is 191.51%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-93.26%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSLR at -32.41%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
266.93%
We repay more while FSLR is negative at -169.52%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
67.66%
Buyback growth of 67.66% while FSLR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.