PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
231.42%
Net income growth above 1.5x FSLR's 11.21%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
4.76%
Some D&A expansion while FSLR is negative at -9.01%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-86.46%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
35.15%
SBC growth well above FSLR's 4.76%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
16.52%
Less working capital growth vs. FSLR's 222.02%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-508.40%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with FSLR at -9.21%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
43.48%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. FSLR's 115.51%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
319.07%
Lower AP growth vs. FSLR's 1713.76%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
-140.57%
Negative yoy usage while FSLR is 228.86%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
48.38%
Some yoy increase while FSLR is negative at -1704.70%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
57.45%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of FSLR's 225.02%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
92.35%
Some CapEx rise while FSLR is negative at -3.08%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1927.59%
We have some outflow growth while FSLR is negative at -1.64%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
271.13%
We have mild expansions while FSLR is negative at -1033.61%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-356.84%
We cut debt repayment yoy while FSLR is 96.72%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.49%
Buyback growth of 29.49% while FSLR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.