PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-12.95%
Negative net income growth while FSLR stands at 124.69%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
0.42%
Some D&A expansion while FSLR is negative at -11.07%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
315.48%
Some yoy growth while FSLR is negative at -33.64%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-9.36%
Both cut yoy SBC, with FSLR at -170.62%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
75.62%
Less working capital growth vs. FSLR's 2157.78%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-20.95%
AR is negative yoy while FSLR is 626.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
575.36%
Inventory growth well above FSLR's 88.55%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-2123.16%
Negative yoy AP while FSLR is 0.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
116.62%
Some yoy usage while FSLR is negative at -18.74%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
282.25%
Some yoy increase while FSLR is negative at -117.52%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
67.36%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of FSLR's 2755.37%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
8.91%
Some CapEx rise while FSLR is negative at -26.50%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines are negative, with FSLR at -55.93%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-82.69%
We reduce yoy other investing while FSLR is 584.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-211.05%
We reduce yoy invests while FSLR stands at 34.74%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
99.82%
We repay more while FSLR is negative at -5392.46%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while FSLR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
66.05%
Buyback growth of 66.05% while FSLR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.