PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
42.34%
Some net income increase while FSLR is negative at -20.78%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-15.57%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with FSLR at -1.79%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-151.38%
Negative yoy deferred tax while FSLR stands at 221.45%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-18.44%
Negative yoy SBC while FSLR is 184.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
92.37%
Slight usage while FSLR is negative at -149.74%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-146.33%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with FSLR at -359.55%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-29.47%
Negative yoy inventory while FSLR is 80.53%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
100.22%
Lower AP growth vs. FSLR's 202.35%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
-137.55%
Both reduce yoy usage, with FSLR at -17.17%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-183.71%
Negative yoy while FSLR is 122.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
28.86%
Some CFO growth while FSLR is negative at -94.79%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
45.12%
CapEx growth well above FSLR's 63.65%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
85.64%
Some yoy expansion while FSLR is negative at -160.10%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-64.58%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSLR at -110.07%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
53.06%
Investing outflow well above FSLR's 63.84%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
1414.26%
Debt repayment above 1.5x FSLR's 69.82%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
82.87%
Buyback growth of 82.87% while FSLR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.