PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
57.20%
Some net income increase while FSLR is negative at -61.64%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-11.73%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with FSLR at -3.79%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
4394.55%
Some yoy growth while FSLR is negative at -113.27%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-8.03%
Negative yoy SBC while FSLR is 3.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-20.41%
Both reduce yoy usage, with FSLR at -170.66%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
153.24%
AR growth while FSLR is negative at -67.94%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-107.15%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with FSLR at -93.97%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-119.52%
Both negative yoy AP, with FSLR at -244.07%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
36.75%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. FSLR's 103.42%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-89.45%
Both negative yoy, with FSLR at -173.31%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-31.01%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with FSLR at -79.71%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
28.88%
Some CapEx rise while FSLR is negative at -79.10%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while FSLR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
181.89%
Growth well above FSLR's 222.22%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
64.47%
We have mild expansions while FSLR is negative at -259.35%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-3049.75%
We cut debt repayment yoy while FSLR is 37.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4014.56%
We cut yoy buybacks while FSLR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.