PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
106.88%
Some net income increase while FSLR is negative at -43.19%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
3.48%
Some D&A expansion while FSLR is negative at -0.85%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-100.00%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
23.36%
SBC growth while FSLR is negative at -54.94%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-167.34%
Negative yoy working capital usage while FSLR is 524.25%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-378.08%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with FSLR at -23.65%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
676.45%
Inventory growth well above FSLR's 393.60%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-163.33%
Negative yoy AP while FSLR is 113.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-40.25%
Negative yoy usage while FSLR is 8.40%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
10.11%
Some yoy increase while FSLR is negative at -15.34%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-139.66%
Negative yoy CFO while FSLR is 234.62%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
41.88%
Some CapEx rise while FSLR is negative at -18.87%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-660.94%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSLR at -96.53%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-268.94%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSLR at -109.05%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
93.86%
Debt repayment above 1.5x FSLR's 7.41%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
49.31%
Buyback growth of 49.31% while FSLR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.