PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-95.57%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with FSLR at -66.54%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
1.22%
Less D&A growth vs. FSLR's 7.88%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
75.59%
Some yoy growth while FSLR is negative at -367.76%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
20.63%
SBC growth well above FSLR's 18.02%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
56.94%
Less working capital growth vs. FSLR's 124.35%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-94.41%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with FSLR at -34.57%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
149.50%
Some inventory rise while FSLR is negative at -694.01%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
195.83%
AP growth well above FSLR's 344.04%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-104.82%
Negative yoy usage while FSLR is 123.98%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
130.36%
Some yoy increase while FSLR is negative at -66.98%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
13.88%
Some CFO growth while FSLR is negative at -48.76%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-80.19%
Negative yoy CapEx while FSLR is 19.12%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines are negative, with FSLR at -41.20%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
123.11%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. FSLR's 47615.42%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-179.52%
We reduce yoy invests while FSLR stands at 22.74%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
346.36%
Debt repayment above 1.5x FSLR's 80.71%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-60.24%
We cut yoy buybacks while FSLR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.