PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
679.42%
Net income growth above 1.5x FSLR's 117.09%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
30.88%
D&A growth well above FSLR's 4.73%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
542.07%
Some yoy growth while FSLR is negative at -141.46%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-0.53%
Negative yoy SBC while FSLR is 10.59%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
16.99%
Less working capital growth vs. FSLR's 362.45%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
125.75%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. FSLR's 497.97%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
749.51%
Inventory growth well above FSLR's 2.44%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
136.48%
A yoy AP increase while FSLR is negative at -140.24%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-545.94%
Negative yoy usage while FSLR is 122.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-341.00%
Both negative yoy, with FSLR at -53.83%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
477.41%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of FSLR's 2065.64%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-98.76%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSLR at -3.20%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-11918.40%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSLR at -323.21%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-891.13%
We reduce yoy other investing while FSLR is 141.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-384.47%
We reduce yoy invests while FSLR stands at 68.29%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
32350.88%
Debt repayment above 1.5x FSLR's 78.30%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
51.56%
Buyback growth of 51.56% while FSLR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.