PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
19.22%
Net income growth under 50% of FSLR's 251.69%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
10.08%
D&A growth well above FSLR's 4.17%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
85.55%
Some yoy growth while FSLR is negative at -288.21%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
3.65%
SBC growth while FSLR is negative at -26.70%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-59.85%
Negative yoy working capital usage while FSLR is 74.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-0.82%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with FSLR at -81.23%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
79.04%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. FSLR's 397.79%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
-227.44%
Negative yoy AP while FSLR is 1773.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-1409.91%
Negative yoy usage while FSLR is 97.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-1356.89%
Both negative yoy, with FSLR at -243.12%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-86.96%
Negative yoy CFO while FSLR is 95.91%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-74.34%
Negative yoy CapEx while FSLR is 29.95%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.51%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. FSLR's 739.32%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
491.42%
Investing outflow well above FSLR's 164.64%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
63.18%
Debt repayment similar to FSLR's 69.90%. Walter Schloss sees parallel liability management or similar free cash flow availability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
95.81%
Buyback growth of 95.81% while FSLR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.