PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-271.96%
Negative net income growth while FSLR stands at 270.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
18.83%
Some D&A expansion while FSLR is negative at -1.72%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
3657.90%
Well above FSLR's 133.56% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
6.11%
Less SBC growth vs. FSLR's 37.94%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
63.38%
Slight usage while FSLR is negative at -230.52%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
598.86%
AR growth while FSLR is negative at -104.55%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-149.08%
Negative yoy inventory while FSLR is 93.54%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-8.83%
Both negative yoy AP, with FSLR at -43.86%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-51.34%
Both reduce yoy usage, with FSLR at -637.64%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
35.89%
Some yoy increase while FSLR is negative at -89.61%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
50.99%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of FSLR's 222.80%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-12.41%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSLR at -16.48%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-109.96%
Negative yoy acquisition while FSLR stands at 78.53%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
77.80%
We have some outflow growth while FSLR is negative at -70.56%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-149.04%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSLR at -46.57%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
99.60%
We repay more while FSLR is negative at -176.25%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.30%
We cut yoy buybacks while FSLR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.