PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.11%
Some net income increase while FSLR is negative at -92.14%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-2.89%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with FSLR at -2.86%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
245.51%
Well above FSLR's 26.03% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-0.27%
Both cut yoy SBC, with FSLR at -38.20%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
20.77%
Slight usage while FSLR is negative at -60.75%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-385.45%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with FSLR at -372.58%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-430.46%
Negative yoy inventory while FSLR is 253.89%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
63.23%
AP growth well above FSLR's 75.41%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
59.72%
Growth well above FSLR's 103.82%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-383.13%
Negative yoy while FSLR is 197.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
18.87%
Some CFO growth while FSLR is negative at -249.08%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-1.71%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSLR at -51.46%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
97.83%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. FSLR's 200.00%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
We have some outflow growth while FSLR is negative at -124.57%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
21.68%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. FSLR's 65.20%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
512.16%
We repay more while FSLR is negative at -324.25%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
95.79%
Similar buyback growth to FSLR's 91.44%. Walter Schloss sees parallel capital return priorities or a stable free cash flow for both.