PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-426.48%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with FSLR at -551.57%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
28.98%
D&A growth well above FSLR's 2.76%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-776.53%
Negative yoy deferred tax while FSLR stands at 5930.54%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-20.81%
Both cut yoy SBC, with FSLR at -28.00%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
442.78%
Well above FSLR's 151.04% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
123.34%
AR growth well above FSLR's 136.08%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
120.83%
Some inventory rise while FSLR is negative at -36.88%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
90.25%
AP growth well above FSLR's 30.56%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
1370.21%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. FSLR's 16434.81%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
297.99%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. FSLR's 18801.80%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
478.71%
Operating cash flow growth similar to FSLR's 505.49%. Walter Schloss would see parallel improvements or market conditions in cash generation.
-26.26%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSLR at -17.18%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while FSLR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-297.92%
We reduce yoy other investing while FSLR is 7502.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-18.08%
We reduce yoy invests while FSLR stands at 793.97%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-9328.11%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSLR at -49578.14%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
56.01%
Buyback growth at 50-75% of FSLR's 98.72%. Martin Whitman questions partial disadvantage in per-share enhancements if competitor repurchases more.