PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-51.12%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with FSLR at -9.76%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-2.76%
Negative yoy D&A while FSLR is 20.67%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-726.54%
Negative yoy deferred tax while FSLR stands at 867.50%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
16.21%
SBC growth while FSLR is negative at -2.44%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
154.38%
Well above FSLR's 34.36% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
225.63%
AR growth well above FSLR's 28.03%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
331.25%
Some inventory rise while FSLR is negative at -114.27%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-100.00%
Negative yoy AP while FSLR is 1037.69%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
17.14%
Growth well above FSLR's 9.32%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
3971.78%
Some yoy increase while FSLR is negative at -215.60%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
83.73%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x FSLR's 17.62%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-90.66%
Negative yoy CapEx while FSLR is 45.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-240.53%
We reduce yoy other investing while FSLR is 103041.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-237.82%
We reduce yoy invests while FSLR stands at 126.72%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-61.21%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSLR at -2276.04%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.48%
We have some buyback growth while FSLR is negative at -148.68%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.