PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
123.96%
Net income growth at 50-75% of FSLR's 190.62%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging competitiveness unless expansions are planned.
138.43%
Some D&A expansion while FSLR is negative at -0.61%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
496.32%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. FSLR's 5686.67%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
29.62%
SBC growth while FSLR is negative at -7.79%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
179.66%
Slight usage while FSLR is negative at -186.08%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
3195.72%
AR growth while FSLR is negative at -140.09%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
412.77%
Inventory growth well above FSLR's 62.37%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-16.07%
Negative yoy AP while FSLR is 191.59%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-166.01%
Both reduce yoy usage, with FSLR at -421.84%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-176.68%
Both negative yoy, with FSLR at -1806.54%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
89.83%
Some CFO growth while FSLR is negative at -88.71%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-305.74%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSLR at -18.39%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-99.94%
We reduce yoy other investing while FSLR is 171468.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-173.67%
We reduce yoy invests while FSLR stands at 97.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
116.41%
We repay more while FSLR is negative at -64437.74%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-209.02%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSLR at -67.16%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.