PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
328.19%
Some net income increase while FSLR is negative at -188.11%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-35.01%
Negative yoy D&A while FSLR is 1.31%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-155.21%
Negative yoy deferred tax while FSLR stands at 114.66%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-7.28%
Negative yoy SBC while FSLR is 105.66%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
35.73%
Slight usage while FSLR is negative at -27.29%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-141.33%
AR is negative yoy while FSLR is 1985.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-131.78%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with FSLR at -108.17%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
517.38%
A yoy AP increase while FSLR is negative at -41.88%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
59.00%
Some yoy usage while FSLR is negative at -39.98%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-959.64%
Negative yoy while FSLR is 93.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
90.53%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x FSLR's 46.53%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-8.65%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSLR at -12.37%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
104.42%
Some acquisitions while FSLR is negative at -62.21%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
114.62%
We have mild expansions while FSLR is negative at -638.70%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.26%
We have some buyback growth while FSLR is negative at -431.40%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.