PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-54.21%
Negative net income growth while FSLR stands at 57.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-98.03%
Negative yoy D&A while FSLR is 8.42%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-79.51%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-35.29%
Both cut yoy SBC, with FSLR at -2.53%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
843.36%
Well above FSLR's 43.59% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
216.47%
AR growth well above FSLR's 1.92%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
281.62%
Some inventory rise while FSLR is negative at -1245.51%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-2710.57%
Both negative yoy AP, with FSLR at -1.91%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-100.22%
Negative yoy usage while FSLR is 3097.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
1908.77%
Well above FSLR's 209.00%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-5.06%
Negative yoy CFO while FSLR is 284.47%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
7.77%
Lower CapEx growth vs. FSLR's 25.21%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
89.85%
Acquisition spending well above FSLR's 99.44%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while FSLR is 8.69%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
91.97%
Growth well above FSLR's 128.36%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
71.97%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. FSLR's 551.23%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
-100.07%
We cut debt repayment yoy while FSLR is 45.51%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
43.91%
Buyback growth at 75-90% of FSLR's 55.87%. Bill Ackman would call for more share repurchases if undervaluation is evident, to match competitor’s approach.