PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-143.07%
Negative net income growth while FSLR stands at 30.12%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
5049.33%
D&A growth well above FSLR's 15.37%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
681.03%
Some yoy growth while FSLR is negative at -328.32%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-9.62%
Negative yoy SBC while FSLR is 34.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
11.20%
Less working capital growth vs. FSLR's 156.17%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-17.25%
AR is negative yoy while FSLR is 138.98%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-92.90%
Negative yoy inventory while FSLR is 136.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
94.07%
A yoy AP increase while FSLR is negative at -158.43%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
43679.13%
Growth well above FSLR's 26.94%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-94.60%
Negative yoy while FSLR is 84.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-39.92%
Negative yoy CFO while FSLR is 239.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
17.37%
Some CapEx rise while FSLR is negative at -21.21%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
100.00%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. FSLR's 3959.30%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
96.24%
We have some outflow growth while FSLR is negative at -101.24%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
15.91%
We have mild expansions while FSLR is negative at -139.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
6800.00%
We repay more while FSLR is negative at -0.63%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
81.20%
Buyback growth at 75-90% of FSLR's 96.48%. Bill Ackman would call for more share repurchases if undervaluation is evident, to match competitor’s approach.