PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-44.84%
Negative net income growth while FSLR stands at 47.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-7.84%
Negative yoy D&A while FSLR is 12.27%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.35%
Negative yoy SBC while FSLR is 23.69%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
94.01%
Slight usage while FSLR is negative at -566.11%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
34.43%
AR growth while FSLR is negative at -121.46%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
167.41%
Inventory growth well above FSLR's 55.83%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
118.24%
AP growth well above FSLR's 129.63%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-206.90%
Both reduce yoy usage, with FSLR at -528.33%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
277.23%
Well above FSLR's 49.16%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
45.59%
Some CFO growth while FSLR is negative at -27.91%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
35.26%
CapEx growth well above FSLR's 11.68%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
35.26%
We have some outflow growth while FSLR is negative at -85.39%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
35.26%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. FSLR's 81.12%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
100.00%
We repay more while FSLR is negative at -1.64%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.