PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
160.27%
Net income growth above 1.5x FSLR's 25.61%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
472.13%
D&A growth well above FSLR's 11.93%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-167.22%
Both cut yoy SBC, with FSLR at -9.99%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-1003.75%
Negative yoy working capital usage while FSLR is 153.70%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-1494.99%
AR is negative yoy while FSLR is 70.53%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
9267.16%
Inventory growth well above FSLR's 171.99%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
69.93%
A yoy AP increase while FSLR is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
533.59%
Growth well above FSLR's 963.70%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-217.35%
Negative yoy while FSLR is 536.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-18.99%
Negative yoy CFO while FSLR is 1609.28%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
29.81%
CapEx growth well above FSLR's 27.74%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33200.00%
We reduce yoy invests while FSLR stands at 66.76%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-86.86%
We cut debt repayment yoy while FSLR is 35.04%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-91.62%
Negative yoy issuance while FSLR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.