PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-82.70%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with FSLR at -46.70%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-9.28%
Negative yoy D&A while FSLR is 1.17%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
130.81%
SBC growth while FSLR is negative at -57.76%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
49.14%
Slight usage while FSLR is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
51.86%
AR growth while FSLR is negative at -186.66%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
76.86%
Some inventory rise while FSLR is negative at -228.69%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
459.92%
AP growth of 459.92% while FSLR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-131.37%
Both reduce yoy usage, with FSLR at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
86.99%
Some yoy increase while FSLR is negative at -9509.31%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
89.72%
Some CFO growth while FSLR is negative at -174.97%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
100.00%
CapEx growth well above FSLR's 34.31%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. FSLR's 1343.85%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
100.00%
Investing outflow well above FSLR's 60.16%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-102.53%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSLR at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
-78.77%
Negative yoy issuance while FSLR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.