1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-89.04%
Negative net income growth while MAXN stands at 75.93%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
117.91%
Some D&A expansion while MAXN is negative at -60.73%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.97%
Less working capital growth vs. MAXN's 186.90%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
134.34%
AR growth while MAXN is negative at -42.57%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-783.73%
Negative yoy inventory while MAXN is 171.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-138.65%
Negative yoy AP while MAXN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
54.55%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. MAXN's 163.52%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
2048.96%
Some yoy increase while MAXN is negative at -91.52%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
88.11%
Operating cash flow growth similar to MAXN's 93.92%. Walter Schloss would see parallel improvements or market conditions in cash generation.
-28.65%
Negative yoy CapEx while MAXN is 63.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while MAXN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
43.44%
Liquidation growth of 43.44% while MAXN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
74.56%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. MAXN's 388.13%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-195.76%
We reduce yoy invests while MAXN stands at 79.56%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with MAXN at -100.85%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.