PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
679.42%
Net income growth above 1.5x MAXN's 75.93%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
30.88%
Some D&A expansion while MAXN is negative at -60.73%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
542.07%
Some yoy growth while MAXN is negative at -201.96%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-0.53%
Negative yoy SBC while MAXN is 81.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
16.99%
Less working capital growth vs. MAXN's 186.90%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
125.75%
AR growth while MAXN is negative at -42.57%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
749.51%
Inventory growth well above MAXN's 171.57%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
136.48%
AP growth of 136.48% while MAXN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-545.94%
Negative yoy usage while MAXN is 163.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-341.00%
Both negative yoy, with MAXN at -91.52%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
477.41%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x MAXN's 93.92%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-98.76%
Negative yoy CapEx while MAXN is 63.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-11918.40%
Negative yoy acquisition while MAXN stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-891.13%
We reduce yoy other investing while MAXN is 388.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-384.47%
We reduce yoy invests while MAXN stands at 79.56%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
32350.88%
Debt repayment above 1.5x MAXN's 4.94%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
51.56%
Buyback growth of 51.56% while MAXN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.