PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-121.56%
Negative net income growth while MAXN stands at 75.93%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-15.17%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with MAXN at -60.73%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-121.56%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-0.78%
Negative yoy SBC while MAXN is 81.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-69.90%
Negative yoy working capital usage while MAXN is 186.90%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
126.87%
AR growth while MAXN is negative at -42.57%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-158.13%
Negative yoy inventory while MAXN is 171.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-213.14%
Negative yoy AP while MAXN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
100.93%
Growth well above MAXN's 163.52%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
127.29%
Some yoy increase while MAXN is negative at -91.52%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-192.69%
Negative yoy CFO while MAXN is 93.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
45.69%
CapEx growth well above MAXN's 63.19%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while MAXN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-861.93%
We reduce yoy other investing while MAXN is 388.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
68.83%
Investing outflow well above MAXN's 79.56%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-374.75%
We cut debt repayment yoy while MAXN is 4.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2400.26%
We cut yoy buybacks while MAXN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.