PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-850.58%
Negative net income growth while MAXN stands at 75.93%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
19.42%
Some D&A expansion while MAXN is negative at -60.73%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-3045.17%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-1.12%
Negative yoy SBC while MAXN is 81.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
1583.68%
Well above MAXN's 186.90% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-781.38%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with MAXN at -42.57%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
205.09%
Inventory growth well above MAXN's 171.57%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.87%
Negative yoy usage while MAXN is 163.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
16231.66%
Some yoy increase while MAXN is negative at -91.52%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
279.96%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x MAXN's 93.92%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-84.96%
Negative yoy CapEx while MAXN is 63.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
175.37%
Acquisition growth of 175.37% while MAXN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1234.15%
Growth well above MAXN's 388.13%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-68.08%
We reduce yoy invests while MAXN stands at 79.56%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
461.78%
Debt repayment above 1.5x MAXN's 4.94%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-109.14%
We cut yoy buybacks while MAXN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.