PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
145.21%
Some net income increase while MAXN is negative at -45.47%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-29.50%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with MAXN at -28.21%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-56.05%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
2.77%
SBC growth while MAXN is negative at -0.05%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-8.46%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MAXN at -110.00%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-26.49%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with MAXN at -63.79%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-114.81%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MAXN at -64.17%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
251.90%
A yoy AP increase while MAXN is negative at -212.33%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-120.90%
Negative yoy usage while MAXN is 42.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-107.79%
Negative yoy while MAXN is 18.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-311.47%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with MAXN at -390.28%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
22.82%
Some CapEx rise while MAXN is negative at -30.27%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
216.62%
Growth of 216.62% while MAXN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
-503.99%
We reduce yoy invests while MAXN stands at 143.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
We repay more while MAXN is negative at -39.06%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
94.96%
Buyback growth of 94.96% while MAXN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.