1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
814.69%
Net income growth above 1.5x MAXN's 105.17%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-78.48%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with MAXN at -7.51%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
2799.84%
Some yoy growth while MAXN is negative at -1401.47%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-0.22%
Both cut yoy SBC, with MAXN at -21.27%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-118.67%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MAXN at -849.38%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-125.99%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with MAXN at -136.88%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-228.89%
Negative yoy inventory while MAXN is 31.69%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-253.18%
Both negative yoy AP, with MAXN at -705.56%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
297.30%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. MAXN's 1296.72%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-165.75%
Both negative yoy, with MAXN at -510.01%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
134.63%
Some CFO growth while MAXN is negative at -21.08%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
50.41%
Some CapEx rise while MAXN is negative at -172.06%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
112.76%
Acquisition growth of 112.76% while MAXN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while MAXN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
1927.93%
Liquidation growth of 1927.93% while MAXN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-112.13%
Both yoy lines negative, with MAXN at -232.80%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
309.96%
We have mild expansions while MAXN is negative at -2565.01%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5828.38%
We cut yoy buybacks while MAXN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.