1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
328.19%
Net income growth above 1.5x MAXN's 49.17%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-35.01%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with MAXN at -9.66%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-155.21%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-7.28%
Negative yoy SBC while MAXN is 187.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
35.73%
Slight usage while MAXN is negative at -173.96%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-141.33%
AR is negative yoy while MAXN is 72.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-131.78%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MAXN at -800.42%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
517.38%
A yoy AP increase while MAXN is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
59.00%
Some yoy usage while MAXN is negative at -114.88%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-959.64%
Negative yoy while MAXN is 14.95%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
90.53%
Some CFO growth while MAXN is negative at -262.62%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-8.65%
Negative yoy CapEx while MAXN is 9.38%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
104.42%
Some acquisitions while MAXN is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
114.62%
We have mild expansions while MAXN is negative at -419.26%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.26%
We have some buyback growth while MAXN is negative at -1014.29%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.