PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-143.07%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with MAXN at -71.93%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
5049.33%
Some D&A expansion while MAXN is negative at -15.38%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
681.03%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. MAXN's 24203.63%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-9.62%
Both cut yoy SBC, with MAXN at -75.82%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
11.20%
Less working capital growth vs. MAXN's 95.30%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-17.25%
AR is negative yoy while MAXN is 313.69%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-92.90%
Negative yoy inventory while MAXN is 251.70%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
94.07%
A yoy AP increase while MAXN is negative at -31.34%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
43679.13%
Some yoy usage while MAXN is negative at -171.62%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-94.60%
Negative yoy while MAXN is 42.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-39.92%
Negative yoy CFO while MAXN is 49.81%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
17.37%
CapEx growth well above MAXN's 23.15%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while MAXN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
96.24%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. MAXN's 35843.63%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
15.91%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. MAXN's 471.57%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
6800.00%
Debt repayment above 1.5x MAXN's 96.00%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
81.20%
Buyback growth of 81.20% while MAXN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.