PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-531.05%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with RUN at -0.65%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
6.95%
D&A growth well above RUN's 11.67%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-133.90%
Negative yoy deferred tax while RUN stands at 13.07%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
43.35%
Less working capital growth vs. RUN's 200.00%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-100.00%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with RUN at -192.98%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-22.82%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with RUN at -523.06%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
100.00%
Lower AP growth vs. RUN's 432.83%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
118.02%
Some yoy usage while RUN is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-9.22%
Both negative yoy, with RUN at -241.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
108.20%
Some CFO growth while RUN is negative at -180.85%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
15.25%
Lower CapEx growth vs. RUN's 210.49%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while RUN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-3669.78%
We reduce yoy other investing while RUN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
54.35%
We have mild expansions while RUN is negative at -5.77%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-100.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while RUN is 2.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.