1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
161.63%
Some net income increase while RUN is negative at -0.65%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-11.90%
Negative yoy D&A while RUN is 11.67%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-100.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while RUN stands at 13.07%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-71.67%
Negative yoy SBC while RUN is 0.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-365.95%
Negative yoy working capital usage while RUN is 200.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
59.85%
AR growth while RUN is negative at -192.98%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-4.46%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with RUN at -523.06%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-40.54%
Negative yoy AP while RUN is 432.83%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-589.33%
Both reduce yoy usage, with RUN at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
111.65%
Some yoy increase while RUN is negative at -241.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-431.41%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with RUN at -180.85%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-63.82%
Negative yoy CapEx while RUN is 210.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
62.75%
Purchases growth of 62.75% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
11.99%
Liquidation growth of 11.99% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-43.93%
We reduce yoy other investing while RUN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
36.96%
We have mild expansions while RUN is negative at -5.77%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Issuance growth of 100.00% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.